{"id":2082,"date":"2015-09-24T21:21:29","date_gmt":"2015-09-24T21:21:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.iuhrdf.org\/en\/2015\/09\/24\/womens-veils-sign-backwardness-says-official-chinas-xinjiang\/"},"modified":"2015-09-24T21:21:29","modified_gmt":"2015-09-24T21:21:29","slug":"womens-veils-sign-backwardness-says-official-chinas-xinjiang","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/womens-veils-sign-backwardness-says-official-chinas-xinjiang\/","title":{"rendered":"Women’s veils a sign of backwardness, says official in China’s Xinjiang"},"content":{"rendered":"

The custom of women wearing face veils is not a tradition of minority people in China’s western area of Xinjiang or in any Muslim country, but is a symbol of extremism and backwardness instead, a senior regional official said on Thursday.<\/p>\n

By By Megha Rajagopalan
Reuters
2015-09-24<\/p>\n

BEIJING (Reuters) – The custom of women wearing face veils is not a tradition of minority people inChina<\/a>‘s western area of Xinjiang or in any Muslim country, but is a symbol of extremism and backwardness instead, a senior regional official said on Thursday.<\/p>\n

Energy-rich Xinjiang, visited this week by British finance minister George Osborne on a rare trip by a Western official, is strategically located on the borders of Central Asia. China has great plans for the region in its new Silk Road strategy.<\/p>\n

The government has stepped up curbs on religious clothing in the heavily Muslim area, where it blames Islamist separatists for violence that has killed hundreds of people over the past few years.<\/p>\n

Many Xinjiang experts say the outlawing of veils and strict enforcement of the rules could further stigmatise the region’s Uighurs, who speak a Turkic language and call the region home.<\/p>\n

Last year, Karamay, a northwestern city in Xinjiang, banned people wearing head scarves, veils or long beards from boarding buses. Authorities in Xinjiang’s capital of Urumqi have also banned the wearing of Islamic veils in public.<\/p>\n

In unusually strong comments, Xaukat Emen, a member of the Xinjiang Communist Party standing committee, said face veils and other coverings for women were “typical extremist attire” and had nothing to do with Xinjiang, or Arab or Muslim countries.<\/p>\n

“A people who totally cover both their eyes are certainly a backward people. We Uighurs do not want to see our female comrades wear this type of clothing,” he told a news conference in Beijing.<\/p>\n

“Many women want to work, and many want to have contact with society. So on this issue, we will resolutely not agree.”<\/p>\n

In some cases, men had worn the veil to kidnap children, he added.<\/p>\n

Uighurs have traditionally followed a moderate form of Islam, but many have begun adopting practices more common in Saudi Arabia or Pakistan<\/a>, such as full-face veils for women, as China has stepped up the security crackdown of recent years.<\/p>\n

Exiles and many rights groups trace the real cause of the unrest to China’s heavy-handed policies, including curbs on Islam and the culture and language of the Uighurs. China denies trying to repress the Uighurs.<\/p>\n

An Uighur himself, Xaukat Emen said the government was committed to supporting religious rights in Xinjiang, especially those relating to important festivals such as Eid and the fasting month of Ramadan.<\/p>\n

“All the people enjoy religious freedom, and the normal religious practices of believers are protected by law,” he said.<\/p>\n

(Writing by Ben Blanchard; Editing by Clarence Fernandez)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The custom of women wearing face veils is not a tradition of minority people in China’s western area of Xinjiang or in any Muslim country, but is a symbol of extremism and backwardness instead, a senior regional official said on Thursday.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":2081,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"topic":[],"class_list":["post-2082","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2082","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2082"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2082\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2081"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2082"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2082"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2082"},{"taxonomy":"topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic?post=2082"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}