{"id":2387,"date":"2016-01-16T00:25:02","date_gmt":"2016-01-16T00:25:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.iuhrdf.org\/en\/2016\/01\/16\/hundreds-academics-urge-chinas-president-free-professor-ilham-tohti\/"},"modified":"2016-01-16T00:25:02","modified_gmt":"2016-01-16T00:25:02","slug":"hundreds-academics-urge-chinas-president-free-professor-ilham-tohti","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/hundreds-academics-urge-chinas-president-free-professor-ilham-tohti\/","title":{"rendered":"Hundreds of academics urge China\u2019s President to free Professor Ilham Tohti"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Four hundred academics from across the world have called on China\u2019s President Xi Jinping to immediately release Uighur Professor Ilham Tohti, on the second anniversary of the day he was taken into custody by authorities.<\/p>\n<p style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: sans-serif, Arial, Verdana, 'Trebuchet MS'; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.9091px;\">15 January 2016, 14:12 UTC | China<\/p>\n<p style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: sans-serif, Arial, Verdana, 'Trebuchet MS'; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.9091px;\">Four hundred academics from across the world have called on China\u2019s President Xi Jinping to immediately release Uighur Professor Ilham Tohti, on the second anniversary of the day he was taken into custody by authorities.<\/p>\n<p style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: sans-serif, Arial, Verdana, 'Trebuchet MS'; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.9091px;\">In an&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.amnesty.org.nz\/sites\/default\/files\/Tohti%20letter%20from%20academics%20-%20Final.pdf\" style=\"color: rgb(30, 164, 250); box-sizing: border-box; background-color: transparent;\">open letter to President Xi,<\/a>&nbsp;scholars from globally recognized academic institutions &#8211; including Harvard University, The University of Hong Kong, and the University of Oxford, among many others &#8211; write that the immediate and unconditional release of Professor Ilham Tohti would be \u201can important way of demonstrating China\u2019s commitment to academic freedom\u201d.<\/p>\n<div style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: sans-serif, Arial, Verdana, 'Trebuchet MS'; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.9091px;\">\n<blockquote style=\"font-style: italic; font-family: Georgia, Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; padding: 2px 8px 2px 20px; border-style: solid; border-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-left-width: 5px;\">\n<p><strong>&#8220;Ilham Tohti is a prisoner of conscience, who is being cruelly punished for peacefully challenging the Chinese government\u2019s policies towards ethnic minorities.&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>Nicholas Bequelin, East Asia Director at Amnesty International<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Ilham Tohti is serving a life sentence solely for expressing ideas that fell well within the boundaries of freedom of expression as an academic and writer. He was taken away from his home in Beijing on 15 January 2014 and found guilty of \u201cseparatism\u201d on 23 September 2014, after a politicized trial that was marred by numerous procedural irregularities.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIlham Tohti is a prisoner of conscience, who is being cruelly punished for peacefully challenging the Chinese government\u2019s policies towards ethnic minorities,\u201d said Nicholas Bequelin, East Asia Director at Amnesty International.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat so many academics from across the world have united to call for Ilham Tohti\u2019s immediate release underlines the gross sense of injustice people feel at his continued imprisonment. President Xi Jinping should heed the scholars\u2019 calls.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Perry Link, a professor at the University of California at Riverside and a renowned expert on human rights and politics in China, said: \u201cWhile much of the world is worrying about \u2018radical Islamic terrorists,\u2019 the Chinese government has given a lifetime sentence to an un-radical Muslim non-terrorist. Why would it do this? Is the purpose to intimidate an entire ethnic group, the vast majority of whom are themselves not radical and far from terrorists? Who, exactly, is terrorizing in this case?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In the letter, the academics state that Ilham Tohti\u2019s release would demonstrate the Chinese authorities \u201crenewed dedication towards increasing mutual understanding among ethnicities and decreasing ethnic tension\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Chinese authorities have tightened their already onerous restrictions on the practice of Islam in the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region (XUAR). Uighurs\u2019 expression of dissent is often portrayed as religious extremism, international terrorism or national security crimes.<\/p>\n<p>Tohti\u2019s trial in 2014 came amid a wave of violent attacks and suppression of protests in the XUAR. Following an earlier wave of violence in 2009 the then UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, urged authorities to \u201creflect on the underlying causes of such incidents, which include discrimination and the failure to protect minority rights.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Ilham Tohti was openly critical of government policies in the XUAR, where Uighurs face widespread discrimination in employment, education, housing, and curtailed religious freedom as well as political marginalization. He has consistently opposed violence and has worked peacefully to build bridges between ethnic communities in accordance with Chinese laws.<\/p>\n<p>Selected portions of Ilham Tohti\u2019s university lectures, which were recorded by a CCTV camera installed in his lecture hall, were presented in the trial and broadcast afterwards on national television, in an attempt to portray him as a separatist who had incited ethnic tension.<\/p>\n<p>Other evidence against Ilham Tohti came from statements by seven former students, who were arrested along with him. There is strong reason to believe that the students gave their statements under coercion. They were sentenced to between three and eight years\u2019 imprisonment on the same charges as Ilham Tohti in December 2014.<\/p>\n<p>Ilham Tohti was held incommunicado and denied access to his lawyers for nearly six months at the start of his pre-trial detention. According to his lawyers, he was denied food for 10 days and had his feet shackled for more than 20 days.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: sans-serif, Arial, Verdana, 'Trebuchet MS'; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.9091px;\">\n<div>DOWNLOADS:&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" class=\"file-icon\" src=\"https:\/\/www.amnesty.org.nz\/modules\/file\/icons\/application-pdf.png\" style=\"box-sizing: border-box; vertical-align: middle;\" title=\"application\/pdf\">&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.amnesty.org.nz\/sites\/default\/files\/Tohti%20letter%20from%20academics%20-%20Final.pdf\" style=\"color: rgb(30, 164, 250); box-sizing: border-box; font-family: AmnestyTradeGothic-BdCn20, Arial; font-size: 16px; text-transform: uppercase; vertical-align: middle; background-color: transparent;\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Tohti letter from academics - Final.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf; length=280000\" rel=\"noopener\">OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT XI<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Four hundred academics from across the world have called on China\u2019s President Xi Jinping to immediately release Uighur Professor Ilham Tohti, on the second anniversary of the day he was taken into custody by authorities.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":2386,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"topic":[],"class_list":["post-2387","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2387","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2387"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2387\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2386"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2387"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2387"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2387"},{"taxonomy":"topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic?post=2387"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}