{"id":3206,"date":"2016-12-08T01:19:53","date_gmt":"2016-12-08T01:19:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.iuhrdf.org\/en\/2016\/12\/08\/draft-law-expands-chinese-police-discretion-gun-use\/"},"modified":"2016-12-08T01:19:53","modified_gmt":"2016-12-08T01:19:53","slug":"draft-law-expands-chinese-police-discretion-gun-use","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/draft-law-expands-chinese-police-discretion-gun-use\/","title":{"rendered":"Draft Law Expands Chinese Police Discretion on Gun Use"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Proposed changes to China\u2019s policing law would grant officers greater discretionary power to use firearms in cases involving public and national security, a step that some activists contend could diminish human rights protections.<\/p>\n<p>Joyce Huang<br \/>\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200bDecember 07, 2016 12:55 PM<\/p>\n<p>Proposed changes to China\u2019s policing law would grant officers greater discretionary power to use firearms in cases involving public and national security, a step that some activists contend could diminish human rights protections.<\/p>\n<p>China last week published draft amendments to its Police Law of 1995. A notice on the Chinese Public Security Bureau\u2019s website said public comment would be accepted through December.<\/p>\n<p>One amendment, Article 31, proposes that police be allowed to use firearms against suspects of public and national security offenses under certain circumstances: if suspects ignore their warnings and try to flee or resist arrest, or when officers face life-threatening assault.<\/p>\n<p>Analysts say such provisions align with those enshrined in China\u2019s controversial counterterrorism laws passed in late 2015. One measure permits police to use weapons in \u201cemergency circumstances\u201d on people committing violent acts, where their warnings prove ineffective.<\/p>\n<p>Another revision, Article 32, would prohibit police from using weapons against pregnant women or children, or at places where inflammable explosives or radioactive materials are stored.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Discretionary power<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The proposals set a clearer boundary for country-level police to use firearms, but ends up allowing authorities to show discretion in determining which circumstances concern public and national security.<\/p>\n<p>China&#8217;s legislature, the National People\u2019s Congress, is expected to approve the draft law.<\/p>\n<p>Li Xiangyang, a human rights lawyer from Shandong province, told VOA that while its \u201cnew restrictions are minor,\u201d the draft \u201cin general expands the police\u2019s discretionary power, which will create room\u201d for police to attack human rights activists.<\/p>\n<p>Li also expressed concerns over the proposed law\u2019s enforcement, because police serve those in power and have often abused their powers.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Amendments to the policing law will not make a difference,&#8221; Li added. &#8220;Let me say this: As long as the authoritarian rule in China remains, the rule of law won\u2019t be honored no matter how progressive the country\u2019s laws have been revised.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Some rights defenders fear police could gun down dissidents, whom they sometimes define as terrorists or mobs. Rights activists say the measures could give police legal justification to use \u2013 or abuse \u2013 their power.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Internet censorship<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Patrick Poon, China researcher at&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.amnesty.org\/en\/\">Amnesty International<\/a>&nbsp;in Hong Kong, shared similar concerns.<\/p>\n<p>He said the draft law would let police further censor news coverage of natural or manmade disasters. Under current law, officers responding to such disasters can cordon off disaster sites, blocking individuals\u2019 or vehicles\u2019 access for safety reasons. But under the draft revision, Poon said officers also could clamp down on disseminating news about such disasters via the internet.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;When necessary,&#8221; according to Article 29, local police will be further allowed to &#8220;implement internet controls if an approval is secured by a province-level public security bureau.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In 2009, China cut off internet access to Urumqi, capital of Xinjiang province, hoping to stem the flow of information about ethnic unrest and police intervention that left at least hundreds dead. It was the deadliest protest since the 1989 crackdown on Tiananmen pro-democracy demonstrations.<\/p>\n<p>The country\u2019s new cybersecurity law, adopted in early November and slated to take effect next June, already gives Chinese authorities the right to block internet access during public-security emergencies.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Imbalances<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Poon said the draft measures provide no checks and balances on expanded police powers. Already, he said, Chinese police officers who commit abuses can operate with impunity because the country lacks an independent judicial system.<\/p>\n<p>For example, Poon said, police rarely are held accountable for acts of torture because of the way they work with courts in China. It\u2019s hard for the judiciary to investigate charges of illegal evidence obtained through torture, because that challenges police authority, he added.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Because of the imbalance of power between the public security, the prosecutors and also the court, it\u2019s very often very unlikely for the prosecutors, the procuratorate to investigate such claims&#8221; of tortures or forced confessions, Poon told VOA.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ensuring rights<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>But Zhan Zhongle, a professor of Beijing University\u2019s Law School, lauded the draft, saying it would uphold the principle of minimum harm on citizens as police perform their duties.<\/p>\n<p>He said the legislation should ensure the rights of all parties.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhile giving the police discretionary power, the law should also take into consideration in three regards: firstly, the police\u2019s authority and responsibilities, secondly, personal and property safety of all parties involved, as well as public security,\u201d Zhan said.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, he agreed that the armed police should have a certain level of discretion in using firearms. But the law should be clarified to prevent them from overstepping their power, which risk citizens\u2019 rights.<\/p>\n<p>Upon seeing the draft, some Chinese netizens responded approvingly while others reacted with harsh words. A Weibo user wrote that police are \u201cnow licensed to kill,\u201d while another questioned why the draft doesn\u2019t require that police keep a video record to document their actions and reduce the possibility of abuse.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Proposed changes to China\u2019s policing law would grant officers greater discretionary power to use firearms in cases involving public and national security, a step that some activists contend could diminish human rights protections.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":3205,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"topic":[],"class_list":["post-3206","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3206","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3206"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3206\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3205"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3206"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3206"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3206"},{"taxonomy":"topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic?post=3206"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}