{"id":373,"date":"2014-02-26T01:55:57","date_gmt":"2014-02-26T01:55:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.iuhrdf.org\/en\/2014\/02\/26\/charges-against-uyghur-academic-ilham-tohti-show-no-one-china-safe-government\/"},"modified":"2014-02-26T01:55:57","modified_gmt":"2014-02-26T01:55:57","slug":"charges-against-uyghur-academic-ilham-tohti-show-no-one-china-safe-government","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/charges-against-uyghur-academic-ilham-tohti-show-no-one-china-safe-government\/","title":{"rendered":"Charges Against Uyghur Academic Ilham Tohti Show “No One in China Is Safe from Government”"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Uyghur Human Rights Project (UHRP) expresses alarm upon hearing that Uyghur economist, Ilham Tohti has been formally arrested and charged with \u201cseparatism.\u201d UHRP believes the charge reflects not only a zero tolerance policy to Uyghur dissent, but also the growing intractability of China towards international criticism of its ethnic policies. UHRP challenges the Chinese government to present compelling evidence to prove its charges against Mr. Tohti and to respect its own laws.<\/p>\n

For immediate release
February 25, 2014, 4:20pm EST
Contact: Uyghur Human Rights Project +1 (202) 478 1920<\/a><\/p>\n

The Uyghur Human Rights Project (UHRP) expresses alarm upon hearing that Uyghur economist, Ilham Tohti has been formally arrested and charged with \u201cseparatism.\u201d UHRP believes the charge reflects not only a zero tolerance policy to Uyghur dissent, but also the growing intractability of China towards international criticism of its ethnic policies. UHRP challenges the Chinese government to present compelling evidence to prove its charges against Mr. Tohti and to respect its own laws.<\/div>\n
 <\/div>\n
\u201cIt doesn\u2019t matter who you are, no one in China is safe from the government,\u201d said UHRP Director, Alim Seytoff in a statement from Washington, DC. \u201cOutspoken or silent, pro-government or anti-government, moderate or extreme, it is of no concern to the Chinese Communist Party. If you displease the leadership in China for any reason, you\u2019ll quickly find yourself in trouble. The government, through its police force, will not hesitate to trump up charges in order for the courts it controls to rubber stamp guilt and a harsh sentence. The case of Ilham Tohti shows there is no space for constructive Uyghur dissent in China.\u201d<\/div>\n
 <\/div>\n
Reports from Reuters<\/a> and AP<\/a> dated February 25, 2014 described how Mr. Tohti\u2019s wife, Guzelnur was notified of her husband\u2019s formal arrest via a warrant she received Tuesday. She also obtained confirmation that Mr. Tohti was being held in a detention center in East Turkestan (also known as Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region). This was the first notice Guzelnur has received as to her husband\u2019s whereabouts since he was detained at their Beijing home on January 15, 2009. Prior to today, she had also not received any notification<\/a> of the reason for his detention.<\/div>\n
 <\/div>\n
According to Article 64 of China\u2019s Criminal Procedure Law<\/a>:<\/div>\n

Within 24 hours after a person has been detained, his family or the unit to which he belongs shall be notified of the reasons for detention and the place of custody, except in circumstances where such notification would hinder the investigation or there is no way of notifying them<\/strong><\/em>. [UHRP bold]\n

UHRP believes the two mitigating circumstances cited by Article 64 of the Criminal Procedure Law do not apply in Mr. Tohti\u2019s case, as Guzelnur\u2019s whereabouts was clearly known to the authorities and given Mr. Tohti was already in police custody far from his home in Beijing, no hindrance to the investigation is immediately detectable.<\/div>\n
 <\/div>\n
Furthermore, Article 96 of the Criminal Procedure Law states:<\/div>\n

The appointed lawyer shall have the right to find out from the investigation organ about the crime suspected of, and may meet with the criminal suspect in custody to enquire about the case.<\/em><\/p>\n

Despite such guarantees under Chinese law, a Radio Free Asia (RFA) article<\/a> dated January 30, 2014 described how Mr. Tohti\u2019s lawyer, Li Fangping had traveled to East Turkestan\u2019s regional capital of Urumchi in order to confirm Mr. Tohti\u2019s whereabouts. Despite the trip, he returned to Beijing with no indication of where Mr. Tohti was being held. Mr. Li was also refused meetings<\/a> with authorities in Beijing according to a second RFA article published on February 18, 2014. Mr. Li told the New York Times<\/a>: \u201cThe way this is being handled completely violates the law\u2026They are trying to create an atmosphere of terror, and my guess is the authorities will try him in the court of public opinion.\u201d<\/div>\n
 <\/div>\n
Prior to the issuing of formal charges, a desultory January 18, 2014 op-ed<\/a> in the Chinese state run Global Times accused Mr. Tohti of links to the \u201cWest,\u201d delivering \u201caggressive lectures\u201d and being the \u201cbrains\u201d behind Uyghur terrorists. The op-ed was followed by a statement<\/a> from the Urumchi Public Security Bureau on its Weibo account alleging Tohti \u201cmade use of his capacity as a teacher to recruit, lure and threaten some people to form a ring and join hands with key people from the East Turkestan Independence Movement to plan and organise people to go abroad to take part in separatist activities [and]\u2026was involved in splitting the country.\u201d<\/div>\n
 <\/div>\n
Since Mr. Tohti was detained on January 15, 2014, a number of government entities and NGOs have expressed concern<\/a> for his welfare.<\/div>\n
 <\/div>\n
US State Department spokeswoman, Jen Psaki said in a statement<\/a>:<\/div>\n

We call on Chinese authorities to immediately account for the whereabouts of Mr. Tohti and his students and guarantee Mr. Tohti and his students the protections and freedoms to which they are entitled under China\u2019s international human rights commitments, including the freedom of expression.<\/em><\/p>\n

European Union ambassador to China, Markus Ederer told reporters<\/a> in a briefing held in Beijing on January 17, 2014:<\/div>\n

I have called on the authorities to treat him in line with Chinese legislation, to substantiate the charges…to inform the family of his whereabouts. If these charges cannot be substantiated, release him.<\/em><\/p>\n

In addition, Chinese citizens began an online petition<\/a> calling for Mr. Tohti\u2019s immediate release. Despite international pressure and concern from within China, Chinese authorities have held firm to a hard line on dissenting Uyghur voices.<\/div>\n
 <\/div>\n
Mr. Tohti, who worked as a professor at the Minzu University of China in Beijing, has often questioned the efficacy of Chinese government policies targeting Uyghurs citing worsening economic, social and cultural conditions in East Turkestan. He is also known for operating the Uighurbiz website, shutdown since his detention, which offers information on Uyghur social issues in Mandarin Chinese and has been hosted overseas after unrest in Urumchi in 2009.<\/div>\n
 <\/div>\n
The pattern of detention directed at Uyghurs with outspoken views on social issues is also demonstrated in the case of Abduweli Ayup<\/a>, who advocated strengthening the use of the Uyghur language in East Turkestan and opened Uyghur-language schools to that effect. Abduweli Ayup was detained in 2013 for \u201callegedly illegally collecting donations\u201d for his school and his current condition and whereabouts are unknown.<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Uyghur Human Rights Project (UHRP) expresses alarm upon hearing that Uyghur economist, Ilham Tohti has been formally arrested and charged with \u201cseparatism.\u201d UHRP believes the charge reflects not only a zero tolerance policy to Uyghur dissent, but also the growing intractability of China towards international criticism of its ethnic policies. UHRP challenges the Chinese government to present compelling evidence to prove its charges against Mr. Tohti and to respect its own laws.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":372,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"topic":[],"class_list":["post-373","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/373","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=373"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/373\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/372"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=373"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=373"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=373"},{"taxonomy":"topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic?post=373"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}