As the search for the missing Malaysia Airlines jetliner spread out across an expanded search area nearly the size of the continental United States, the Chinese government said on Tuesday that it had ruled out the possibility that any of the Chinese citizens on the plane<\/p>\n
By CHRIS BUCKLEY and KEITH BRADSHER
MARCH 18, 2014<\/p>\n
SEPANG, Malaysia \u2014 As the search for the missing Malaysia Airlines jetliner spread out across an expanded search area nearly the size of the continental United States, the Chinese government said on Tuesday that it had ruled out the possibility that any of the Chinese citizens on the plane \u2014 about two-thirds of the 227 passengers \u2014 were terrorists, separatists or malcontents who might have tried to hijack or destroy the plane.<\/p>\n
Searching one possible flight path, Australia said it would focus its efforts in a specific stretch of the southern Indian Ocean, using computer models of the plane\u2019s possible flight path that take into account undisclosed satellite data, wind conditions and ocean currents and some assumptions about how fast it was flying and how much fuel it had left.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat we\u2019re doing is producing our best estimate of the most likely place to search, but I would hasten to add it is very far from precise,\u201d said John Young, general manager for the Australian Maritime Safety Authority\u2019s emergency response division. \u201cEvery attempt will be made to further refine the search area,\u201d Mr. Young told reporters at a news conference in Canberra on Tuesday.<\/p>\n
China\u2019s public effort to narrow the range of possible suspects in the plane\u2019s disappearance included a specific look at one Chinese citizen who belongs to the Uighur ethnic minority, a Turkic people living mostly in Xinjiang, a restive region in far western China. Part of Xinjiang is included in the expanded search area for the missing plane. But the Chinese ambassador to Malaysia, Huang Huikang, said in Kuala Lumpur on Tuesday that Beijing had not received any relevant threats from Uighur separatist groups, and that the Uighur passenger had been cleared of suspicion.<\/p>\n
\u201cChina has conducted a thorough investigation, and to date we have not found any signs that any passengers onboard the plane participated in destruction or terror attacks,\u201d Mr. Huang said at a news briefing for Chinese reporters, according to a summary published online by a state-run newspaper, The People\u2019s Daily.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe can say that we have generally ruled out the possibility of Chinese passengers engaging in destruction or a terrorist attack,\u201d Mr. Huang was quoted as saying.<\/p>\n
The ambassador\u2019s remarks were all the more striking because the Chinese government has often claimed that Uighur groups seeking autonomy or an independent homeland in Xinjiang have orchestrated acts of terrorism, including attempted attacks aboard domestic flights.<\/p>\n
Mr. Huang\u2019s announcement seemed likely to increase the pressure on investigators to determine whether the pilot or co-pilot of the missing jet, both Malaysians, or anyone else onboard was involved in its disappearance. Officials have said that the plane\u2019s abrupt deviation from its normal flight path on March 8 most likely involved deliberate intervention by an experienced aviator, making the two men assigned to the cockpit \u2014 Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah, 53, and his junior officer, Fariq Abdul Hamid, 27 \u2014 focal points of attention.<\/p>\n
Mr. Huang explicitly ruled out suspicions about Maimaitijiang Abula, an artist of Uighur ethnicity who was part of a Chinese government-approved delegation of artists who visited Malaysia. \u201cCurrently, there is no evidence to prove that he engaged in any terrorist or destructive activities,\u201d Mr. Huang said, according to Chinese television news. \u201cAnd nor has any organization or individual made political demands to the government concerning this incident.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Chinese government maintains extensive records and surveillance on its citizens, especially anyone with a reputation for discontent, and it would have used that information as the starting point for police inquiries into any potential suspects on the plane, according to Pan Zhiping, a professor at Xinjiang University who studies unrest in the region. Mr. Zhiping said he saw \u201cno signs of Uighur involvement.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThese background checks are relatively easy in China,\u201d he said. \u201cI think that the government felt that this search is already so large and so complicated that it would be helpful to publicly exclude at least one aspect, especially when there have been many rumors and media speculation about a connection to Xinjiang.\u201d<\/p>\n
Breaking from its usual reluctance to criticize friendly neighbors, the Chinese government has chided the Malaysian authorities and demanded more prompt and more accurate information about the investigation. \u201cCurrently, there\u2019s no lack of information,\u201d Mr. Huang, the ambassador, said Tuesday. \u201cThe main problem we confront is chaotic information, with all manner of speculation, even rumors, filling the heavens. It makes it impossible to think.\u201d<\/p>\n
American officials said on Tuesday that the sharp turn to the west that took the plane from its planned northeastward flight path was achieved using a computer system on the plane, and that the turn was most likely programmed into it by someone in the cockpit who was knowledgeable about airplane systems.<\/p>\n
Malaysian officials have not publicly confirmed that information, but they have revised their account of events around the time the plane vanished from air traffic control communications.<\/p>\n
Hishammuddin Hussein, the Malaysian defense minister and acting transportation minister, said on Tuesday that despite the revisions to the details of the chronology, investigators continued to think that the plane probably went off course because of something someone did intentionally, rather than mechanical failure or an accident.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt has not changed our belief, as stated, that up until the point which it left primary radar coverage, the aircraft\u2019s movements were consistent with deliberate action by someone on the plane,\u201d Mr. Hishammuddin said at a news conference.<\/p>\n
When the chief executive of Malaysia Airlines, Ahmad Jauhari Yahya, was asked about the possibility that the turn off course was programmed by someone in the cockpit, he did not give a definitive answer. \u201cAs far as we\u2019re concerned, the aircraft was programmed to fly to Beijing,\u201d he said. \u201cOnce you\u2019re in the aircraft, anything is possible.\u201d<\/p>\n
A satellite over the Indian Ocean received a final transmission from an automatic data system on the plane hours after the last radio or radar contact, leading investigators to deduce that the plane sent it from somewhere along one of two long, arcing corridors that together encompass 2.24 million square nautical miles, or 2.97 million square miles, Mr. Hishammuddin said at a news briefing on Tuesday. That is an area the size of the continental United States, excluding California.<\/p>\n
One of the two arcs reaches from northern Laos to Central Asia. The plane would be at the Laotian end of the arc if it traveled at the slow end of its possible speed, or in Kazakhstan near the Caspian Sea if it traveled at top speed. Any speed in between would have put the plane somewhere in western or southwestern China, including remote, mountainous terrain in Tibet.<\/p>\n
China carefully watches its frontiers, however, and has given no indication that its radar picked up any signs of the plane. Even so, Mr. Huang said, the Chinese authorities have begun searching the large section of the northern corridor that crosses the nation\u2019s land territory. The Chinese Navy will also send ships to search the seas west of India\u2019s Andaman Islands in the Bay of Bengal and to the seas southwest of the Indonesian island of Sumatra, a spokesman for the navy said, according to the China News Service, a state-run agency.<\/p>\n
If the plane had instead traveled on the southern arc, it may have been anywhere from Indonesia to the southern Indian Ocean, west of Australia, when it was last in contact with a satellite.<\/p>\n
On Monday, the Australian prime minister, Tony Abbott, said his government would coordinate the search in the southern Indian Ocean. That search would start from about 1,500 nautical miles southwest of Perth, the capital of Western Australia, and could cover about 175,000 square nautical miles using ships and aircraft from Australia, the United States and New Zealand, the Australian Maritime Safety Authority said on Tuesday. That area of initial focus does not include other, less likely parts of the ocean that may also be searched.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe sheer size of the search area poses a huge challenge,\u201d said Mr. Young, the general manager of the safety authority.<\/p>\n
Cmdr. William Marks, a spokesman for the United States Seventh Fleet, said the navy had sent a Boeing P-8A Poseidon aircraft to Australia to help in the daunting task. The American destroyer Kidd withdrew from the search on Monday, Commander Marks said in an email, because the new search area is so vast that searching it with relatively slow-moving surface ships and their onboard helicopters would take much too long. The Poseidon aircraft, which Boeing says has a range of about 1,200 nautical miles, can cover territory much faster.<\/p>\n
Michelle Innis contributed reporting from Sydney, Australia, and Edward Wong from Beijing. Bree Feng contributed research from Beijing.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" As the search for the missing Malaysia Airlines jetliner spread out across an expanded search area nearly the size of the continental United States, the Chinese government said on Tuesday that it had ruled out the possibility that any of the Chinese citizens on the plane<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":460,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"topic":[],"class_list":["post-461","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/461","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=461"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/461\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/460"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=461"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=461"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=461"},{"taxonomy":"topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iuhrdf.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic?post=461"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}