An antique map of China gifted by the German Chancellor to China’s President is at odds with how China views its historical boundaries. Chancellor Merkel probably meant well. In Berlin last week, she gave her guest, Chinese President Xi Jinping, a 1735 map of China made by esteemed French cartographer Jean-Baptiste Bourguignon d\u2019Anville (1697\u20131 782). The map, part of a series by d\u2019Anville, was based in part on information gleaned by Jesuit missionaries. It was well-regarded at the time and republished for decades to come.<\/p>\n
Emily Rauhala \/ Beijing @emilyrauhala 6:26 AM ET<\/p>\n
An antique map of China gifted by the German Chancellor to China’s President is at odds with how China views its historical boundaries<\/p>\n
Chancellor Merkel probably meant well. In Berlin last week, she gave<\/a> her guest, Chinese President Xi Jinping, a 1735 map of China made by esteemed French cartographer Jean-Baptiste Bourguignon d\u2019Anville (1697\u20131 782). The map, part of a series by d\u2019Anville, was based in part on information gleaned by Jesuit missionaries. It was well-regarded at the time and republished<\/a> for decades to come.<\/p>\n A perfect gift for a visiting dignitary, right? You would think so. But ever since the exchange, China\u2019s Internet has been buzzing about the gift. Why did Merkel choose this particular item? What was the message in the map?<\/p>\n For students of Chinese history, the date jumps out. This was the height of the great Qing Dynasty, specifically the year when the Qianlong Emperor ascended to power. He presided over a military expansion west and north, but his death, in 1799, is associated with the period of decline that followed.<\/p>\n And then there are the boundaries. The 1735 d\u2019Anville map<\/a> shows \u201cChina proper\u201d as a land mass separate from areas like Xinjiang, Tibet, Mongolia and Manchuria. The island of Hainan is drawn in a different color, as is Taiwan. This depiction is utterly at odds with how history is taught here.<\/p>\n Chinese students learn that these areas are inalienable<\/a> parts of China, and that they have been for a long, long time. One netizen described<\/a> the map as a \u201cslap\u201d from Merkel. \u201cWe always say some regions are inalienable parts of China since ancient times, but Merkel told us that even in 18th century those regions still did not belong to China.\u201d<\/p>\n Another reasoned that it was the map-makers, not Chancellor Merkel, who messed things up. \u201cMerkel has no special connotation,\u201d they wrote<\/a>. \u201cAt that time German priests [sic] were not allowed to travel in such areas.\u201d<\/p>\n To complicate the matter, at least two different versions of the map have been circulating online. State news wire Xinhua seems to have published<\/a> an entirely different version<\/a> of the map, prompting an entirely different set of theories.<\/p>\n